Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong J. L. Mackie
Publisher:

It really depends who the list is for. Are aware of them, it would have to be by some special faculty or moral perception or intuition, utterly different from our ordinary ways of knowing anything else" (J.L. Mackie's widely reprinted argument against the objectivity of moral values (from his Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong) might work. The present work belongs to a tradition in meta-ethics most closely associated with the work of J L Mackie. Logical positivism led to greater emphasis on meta-ethics, which seeks more to understand why and how what is good or right is thus considered as good as against bad and as right as against wrong. 9 I experience myself talking about true and false moral statements, such as “Pain is bad.” Non-cognitivists seem to deny that I can do this. Not an easy task when what is considered right and wrong is almost, if not always, a matter of perception. JL Mackie "Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong". Logical positivists' preference of meta- ethics is from a cognitive perspective which gives preference to .. Ethics is a form of philosophy which seeks to categorise, codify and champion concepts of right and wrong. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. It seems we have forgotten that we, human beings, invented this economy. Charles Pigden said in reply to David Gordon Dear David,. Secondly, there are no moral facts (a position called moral nihilism or an error theory of morality, defended in his book, Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong). Mackie, Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, 1977, p.38). This is demonstrated perfectly by a glance at the current state of our world. It can be found in shortened versions in more than a few intro to ethics texts. The claim that either moral knowledge is impossible or moral value does not exist, defined respectively, is more popularly associated with J.L. Also his book “Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong” is good but probably only the first few chapters are worth reading (it's metaethics not ethics… that's my excuse). Some will seek to demonstrate the existence of an objective, universal morality with .